factsmate.

Tarim Basin mummies: DNA shows locals, not Western migrants

100 sec read
Tarim Basin mummies: DNA shows locals, not Western migrants

China's 'Western-looking' Bronze Age mummies turned out to be a genetically isolated local people descended from Ice Age Ancient North Eurasians.

Verified · Max Planck Society

The Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies of western China were not migrants from the West, despite their “Western” looks: a genomic study published in Nature on 27 October 2021 found they descended from a local, genetically isolated population with deep Asian roots and no detectable mixing with any other Holocene group.

Since the late 1990s, hundreds of naturally mummified bodies dating from about 2000 BC to AD 200 have been recovered in Xinjiang’s Taklamakan Desert, many buried in boat-shaped coffins. Their so-called Western features, felted and woven wool clothing and herding economy led scholars to propose two origin stories: descendants of Yamnaya-linked herders from the Black Sea steppe, perhaps speakers of the Indo-European Tocharian languages, or migrants from the oasis cultures of Central Asia.

The team, from Jilin University, the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Harvard and others, sequenced 13 of the earliest mummies (about 2100–1700 BC), from sites such as Xiaohe, plus 5 older individuals from the neighbouring Dzungarian Basin. Neither theory survived. The Tarim people carried only local ancestry, tracing back to the Ancient North Eurasians, an Ice Age population that had otherwise largely vanished. Today that ancestry survives mostly in fragments: Indigenous peoples of Siberia and the Americas carry the most, about 40%.

Isolation in genes did not mean isolation in habits. Milk proteins in their dental plaque show cattle, sheep and goat dairying from the founding generation, and their food combined West Asian wheat, East Asian millet and Central Asian ephedra.

“We have found one in the most unexpected place.” — geneticist Choongwon Jeong, on finding a surviving Ancient North Eurasian population

What the DNA did not settle

The genes overturned one language theory without resolving another. The Dzungarian neighbours, just to the north, did carry mostly Afanasievo steppe ancestry, so the authors suggest Tocharian may have reached the region with them instead. Who first spoke it in the Tarim Basin remains open. As with Ötzi the Iceman, ancient DNA reveals ancestry, not the language a people spoke.

13
Tarim genomes sequenced
2100 BC
oldest mummies sampled
~40%
ANE ancestry, highest today

Sources & references

3 references

Well-established. Corroborated by 3 independent sources.

1 Max Planck Society Research institute press release on the Nature study In contrast to populations today, the Tarim Basin mummies show no evidence of admixture with any other Holocene groups, forming instead a previously unknown genetic isolate that likely underwent an extreme and prolonged genetic bottleneck prior to settling the Tarim Basin. mpg.de ↗
2 PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine) academic Instead, although Tocharian may have been plausibly introduced to the Dzungarian Basin by Afanasievo migrants during the Early Bronze Age, we find that the earliest Tarim Basin cultures appear to have arisen from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighbouring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices… pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
3 ScienceDaily reference This population, known as the Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), survives only fractionally in the genomes of present-day populations, with Indigenous populations in Siberia and the Americas having the highest known proportions, at about 40 percent. sciencedaily.com ↗
✓ Last reviewed

More like this