factsmate.

Singapore's guns didn't face the wrong way in 1942

On this day · 15 February 1942
100 sec read
Singapore's guns didn't face the wrong way in 1942

Britain's 'impregnable fortress' fell in February 1942 — but not because its big guns couldn't turn. The real story is ammunition and neglect.

Verified · Imperial War Museums

Singapore fell on 15 February 1942, when Lt-Gen Arthur Percival signed the largest surrender in British history to Japan’s Lt-Gen Tomoyuki Yamashita, handing over about 85,000 troops to an attacking force of roughly 35,000. Japanese forces had invaded northern Malaya little more than two months earlier.

Did Singapore’s guns face the wrong way?

Not really. The story that the island’s great 15-inch guns pointed uselessly out to sea, unable to turn on an enemy coming from the north, is one of the war’s enduring myths. Three of the five could traverse a full 360 degrees, and they did fire on the advancing Japanese. The real problem was ammunition: no land-service shells had been supplied, only armour-piercing rounds designed to punch through warships, which did little against troops. And the guns did their intended job — Japan never attacked from the sea.

Then why did the “fortress” fall?

Singapore had been underfunded for years, Malaya had almost no prepared defences, and most senior British planners privately accepted that the island could not be held once the mainland was lost. Churchill still ordered Percival to hold it to the last man. By mid-February food, water and ammunition were running out and civilians were trapped under bombardment.

At 5.15 pm Percival’s delegation left for the Ford Motor Factory, Yamashita’s headquarters. Yamashita, worried that the British would discover how outnumbered he was, banged the table, demanded unconditional surrender and threatened a night attack on the city. Percival signed at 7.50 pm. Estimates of the men captured run from about 80,000 to 85,000, depending on who is counted, and for most of them captivity meant years of brutal treatment.

“The worst disaster and largest capitulation in British history.” — Winston Churchill, The Second World War

The surrender began three and a half years of Japanese occupation. The campaign itself had opened in the same hours as the attack on Pearl Harbor, as Japan struck across the Pacific at once.

85,000
troops surrendered
35,000
Japanese attackers
3 of 5
big guns could turn

Sources & references

4 references

Well-established. Corroborated by 4 independent sources.

1 Imperial War Museums Museum / research On the 15th of February 1942, Lt General Arthur Percival signed the largest surrender in British history at Singapore. The city was supposed to be a fortress, but his force of 85,000 men had been defeated by just 35,000 Japanese troops. iwm.org.uk ↗
2 SG101 Singapore government education resource Faced with this ultimatum, Percival signed the surrender document at 7.50 pm. sg101.gov.sg ↗
3 The Churchill Project, Hillsdale College academic The reality, however, is that three of these five guns had a full 360-degree traverse. They could and did fire at the Japanese attackers, albeit to little effect. winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu ↗
4 Naval Historical Society of Australia historical society Furthermore, no land service ammunition was provided for the 15-inch guns and the only supply of ammunition was armour-piercing for use against ships. navyhistory.au ↗
✓ Last reviewed

More like this